3 ms·
No they didn't. The "5)" was indicating a further option. That is very much a suggestion and not a statement of fact.
by Lerc 4y ago
No they didn't. The "5)" was indicating a further option. That is very much a suggestion and not a statement of fact.
- JumpCrisscross 4y agoFair enough. It’s a remote possibility for a company with literally no known legal structure and under criminal investigation in multiple jurisdictions, but sometimes unicorns fart rainbows.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]