3 ms·
"voting with your wallet" is a dream that simply does not work in practice. Especially in situations like cell phones where you have extremely limited options.
by autoexec 4y ago
"voting with your wallet" is a dream that simply does not work in practice. Especially in situations like cell phones where you have extremely limited options. Companies have simply refused to provide a product that delivers the features customers want because they make more money by denying you those features and they know that customers can't afford to go without something and will be forced to settle for whatever they decide to offer.
If something will make a company more money, then they will always do that thing. If not making products repairable makes them more money they will never do it until they are forced to by law, which is exactly what has happened. In fact, companies make so much money refusing to make repairable products that they've invested huge amounts of money into technology and laws that make it illegal or impossible for users to repair their products which is what brought us to the point we're at now where consumers had no choice but to petition the government to intervene.
- f1shy 4y agoYou are totally right. My comment applies with free market, in a mono- or duo- poly it just will not work.
- supportlocal4h 4y agoAnd yet, I can still buy a "not smart" phone. Because enough people have voted with their wallets. There is a market worth $millions there and vendors willing to meet the demand.
- autoexec 4y agoI'd guess that just means that non-smart phones are cheap enough to manufacture that they can make more money selling them than they would by refusing to. Especially since a lot of people who buy a non-smart phone already have a smart phone as well. They're so cheap I can get a flip phone for less money than an iphone case.