5 ms·

Getting downvoted for suggesting a company might be solvent.

• JumpCrisscross 4y ago
  > downvoted for suggesting a company might be solvent The comment said they are solvent. Not that they might be. Given the present facts and circumstances, that’s unfounded. (EDIT: Never mind.)
  • Lerc 4y ago
    No they didn't. The "5)" was indicating a further option. That is very much a suggestion and not a statement of fact.
    • JumpCrisscross 4y ago
      Fair enough. It’s a remote possibility for a company with literally no known legal structure and under criminal investigation in multiple jurisdictions, but sometimes unicorns fart rainbows.
    • deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]
  • totalZero 4y ago
    > Possibilities: The comment said the fifth possibility is that they are solvent.
  • danaris 4y ago
    The comment said that Tether is solvent. I do not believe this is sufficiently well-proven to be something we can take as a given.
• loeg 4y ago
  The idea that Tether is solvent is the problem.