5 ms·
> There is a problem with correlation vs causation in the article’s logic No, there isn't. The causation is self-evident, and also unsurprising since it's the
by goodpoint 4y ago
> There is a problem with correlation vs causation in the article’s logic
No, there isn't. The causation is self-evident, and also unsurprising since it's the whole point of unions.
- MoreSEMI 4y agoI think stating that something is self-evident is not a helpful argument. First, it seemingly isn’t or else parent would not have posted as such. And secondly, something being self evident is only used when you want to describe an axiom because you cannot prove otherwise.
- civopsec 4y agoSaying that something is merely a “correlation” (not a causation—and implying that this other thing is) and saying that something is “self-evident” are both arrogant statements when you just end up saying, hey, look at this narrative that I like instead.
- geysersam 4y agoAs someone who lives in a country were unions were one of the major political forces during the 20th century, the impact they had on the social and economic development is truly self evident and mostly (overwhelmingly so) positive. Of course, the GP might be from a country with another experience.
- zdragnar 4y agoAmerican labor unions are closer to cartels and the setup would be illegal in many European countries; in some states you aren't forced to join a union, but you still have to pay at least part of the dues that ostensibly covers contact negotiations. In other states, you must join the union as a condition of being hired. Contrast that with countries where unions (like health care) are not tied to an employer. The whole dynamic is very different, and I think less adversarial between unions and employees. In the US if you have a problem with your union, you are out of luck. Make waves, and the union will make your life hell. It's a second layer of rent seeking management. Ever since the SEIU tried to take a cut of all government benefits to families who care for disabled people in MN, it was obvious that unions here exist to serve only themselves.
- MoreSEMI 4y agoOk, fair point from an individuals view. But considering that its known that unions are a controversial opinion, it would still seem rash to state its obviousness.
- phil21 4y agoIt's completely "self-evident" to me that the US can never re-achieve post-WWII prosperity largely for the reasons OP stated. It was a moment in history that will not repeated in any of our lifetimes. Anything else against this backdrop is basically a rounding error. I was alive during the drawdown of US industrial capacity and my entire family was blue collar mostly union workers. In my teens and 20's I worked such jobs. This narrative still rings largely true to me. The amount of outright waste and fraud in these industries at the labor level was astronomical. We were begging to be outcompeted. Combined with managerial incompetence we were doomed.
- ChuckNorris89 4y ago>It was a moment in history that will not repeated in any of our lifetimes. Unless of course we have another world war, which isn't really unlikely given the shortages and events climate change will bring in the future.