3 ms·
The previous post was making descriptive claims about US healthcare but then you responded with an abstract principle supported by an example in chips. It’s muc
by threatofrain 4y ago
The previous post was making descriptive claims about US healthcare but then you responded with an abstract principle supported by an example in chips. It’s much more apt to go straight to your very last sentence.
- naasking 4y agoNo, I made a general point about government and private interests having different failure modes, this person responded by calling my point devoid of evidence and that private interests form monopolies and cartels and that healthcare somehow disproves my general argument, and I showed an existence proof that their single example is not generalizable and not reflective of the common case.