3 ms·

If the problem lies in the entitlement of a person, an appropriate response is going to be an ad hominem, and rightfully so.

jodrellblank 4y ago
You have not shown any signs of this spectre of entitlement haunting your every comment. If you had, an appropriate response would be educational, helpful, or perhaps a link to Rich Hickey's Gist[1]. By your comments, it would be appropriate to ad-hom you now for your apparent entitlement to controling other people's speech about OSS, right? [1] https://gist.github.com/richhickey/1563cddea1002958f96e7ba9519972d9 https://gist.github.com/richhickey/1563cddea1002958f96e7ba95...
- blueflow 4y ago
  Its simpler: your attitude is bad, i told you off, you have no intentions to change your attitude, neither do i. And if thats "controling other people's speech" to you, then yes, your attitude is the problem. Realistically, i'm just some random dude on this forum, telling you off is the worst thing i can do to you. Enjoy your refund.
  - jodrellblank 4y ago
    > "you have no intentions to change your attitude, neither do i." Multiple times now I have pointed out that I have not shown the behaviours you are accusing me of. The difference of who has intentions to change is that you are wrong. > “i'm just some random dude on this forum, telling you of” You are doing so like a teacher with the wrong understanding, and despite being corrected you are intent on making sure someone gets told off whether it’s appropriate or not. > Enjoy your refund. You are free to link to the place in this thread where I personally said I was unsatisfied with some piece of software, or unsatisfied with the work someone was doing on it, or in any way mentioned desiring a refund or expecting more work? I think you won't be able to find such a place, so your 'clever comment' falls flat.

3 ms·

If the problem lies in the entitlement of a person, an appropriate response is going to be an ad hominem, and rightfully so.

by blueflow 4y ago

jodrellblank 4y ago
You have not shown any signs of this spectre of entitlement haunting your every comment. If you had, an appropriate response would be educational, helpful, or perhaps a link to Rich Hickey's Gist[1]. By your comments, it would be appropriate to ad-hom you now for your apparent entitlement to controling other people's speech about OSS, right? [1] https://gist.github.com/richhickey/1563cddea1002958f96e7ba9519972d9 https://gist.github.com/richhickey/1563cddea1002958f96e7ba95...
- blueflow 4y ago
  Its simpler: your attitude is bad, i told you off, you have no intentions to change your attitude, neither do i. And if thats "controling other people's speech" to you, then yes, your attitude is the problem. Realistically, i'm just some random dude on this forum, telling you off is the worst thing i can do to you. Enjoy your refund.
  - jodrellblank 4y ago
    > "you have no intentions to change your attitude, neither do i." Multiple times now I have pointed out that I have not shown the behaviours you are accusing me of. The difference of who has intentions to change is that you are wrong. > “i'm just some random dude on this forum, telling you of” You are doing so like a teacher with the wrong understanding, and despite being corrected you are intent on making sure someone gets told off whether it’s appropriate or not. > Enjoy your refund. You are free to link to the place in this thread where I personally said I was unsatisfied with some piece of software, or unsatisfied with the work someone was doing on it, or in any way mentioned desiring a refund or expecting more work? I think you won't be able to find such a place, so your 'clever comment' falls flat.