3 ms·
This is not meant as a criticism of you by any means for providing the URL - you are providing an answer to a question by advising of an existing service - but
by MollyRealized 4y ago
This is not meant as a criticism of you by any means for providing the URL - you are providing an answer to a question by advising of an existing service - but the fact that this methodology has to exist in order for this option to be available to anyone is sick, and it also seems a de-motivator for any non-bribery-related legitimate path to ever be put in place.
- from 4y agoYeah I've commented on this [before](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33040446 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33040446). The other thing is that a lot of the people unbanned by these kinds of services really did deserve to be banned. Until people inside these companies start expressing skepticism about what the abuse/"risk" departments do and how they handle false positives nothing will change so I just see it as a necessary evil but fortunately it seems some Facebook employees in this thread offered to help.