> “ Of course, you could argue the same about much of human "reasoning", too...” This my point - you can argue the exact thing for humans. I thing Turing was a

> “ Of course, you could argue the same about much of human "reasoning", too...” This my point - you can argue the exact thing for humans. I thing Turing was actually more prophetic with his test than people give him credit for. Of course humans aren’t looking up and reporting back the exact text of an article, but neither is gpt.