5 ms·
Typically, when one refers to an element as "radioactive" one is either referring to a particular isotope that is radioactive (e.g., C14) or an element in which
by hcknwscommenter 4y ago
Typically, when one refers to an element as "radioactive" one is either referring to a particular isotope that is radioactive (e.g., C14) or an element in which the most abundant naturally occurring isotope(s) are radioactive (e.g., U). To call "carbon" radioactive, is technically true I suppose depending on your view but the level of radioactivity in natural carbon is so low that it is an almost meaningless truth. Potassium and calcium have a bit more natural radioactivity, but still it poses no health issues. The other elements you list are essentially the same, except perhaps Halfnium (have not checked). Heck by the definition you seem to be using of the term "radioactive element", I do not think there exists a non-radioactive element.
Of course, you are correct that the dangers of radioactivity depend on the dose. But your message is diminished by overly emphasizing the radioactivity in carbon and other naturally occurring elements that pose zero health risk and frankly are so very non-radioactive in a relative sense.
- adrian_b 4y agoA chemical element is called "radioactive" whenever at least one of its naturally occurring isotopes is radioactive. Whenever at least one isotope is radioactive, anything containing that element is radioactive, but with a lower activity, proportional with the natural abundance of the radioactive isotope. Because the isotopic abundance also matters, elements like carbon and potassium have very low activities even if their radioactive isotopes have high activities, because the abundance of their radioactive isotopes is very low. The majority of the naturally occurring chemical elements, i.e. about three quarters of them, are non-radioactive. Even if the naturally occurring chemical elements either are non-radioactive or have low radioactivity, otherwise they would have disappeared since the formation of the Solar System, their radioactivity is non-negligible due to the huge number of atoms that exist in every gram of substance. Inside a human body, during each second, thousands of atoms disintegrate, emitting radiation. However, almost all damage caused by the natural radiation is repaired, because all living cells have very efficient mechanisms for this. Only at higher doses those are overwhelmed.
- trashtester 4y ago> A chemical element is called "radioactive" whenever at least one of its naturally occurring isotopes is radioactive. I think you the defintion is the opposite, ie that an element is considered radioactive if NO isotopes are stable (ie ALL are radioactive). https://www.thoughtco.com/list-of-radioactive-elements-608644 https://www.thoughtco.com/list-of-radioactive-elements-60864...
- hcknwscommenter 4y ago>The majority of the naturally occurring chemical elements, i.e. about three quarters of them, are non-radioactive. Huh? Care to name 5 non-radioactive elements according to your definition?