4 ms·
"then they should be publicly offering their own correspondences up for inspection" We already are, the government has made it fairly clear that they have the
by devs1010 15y ago
"then they should be publicly offering their own correspondences up for inspection"
We already are, the government has made it fairly clear that they have the "right" to read anyone's emails they please due to their bullshit "war on terror", its about time we get the same chance to do it to them
- jasondrowley 15y agoCorrect me if I'm wrong, but I'm under the impression that government employees' correspondence with a private company is confidential.
- quanticle 15y agoIs it? If it is, it shouldn't be. If the matter concerns clear and present threats to national security, then why is a private firm involved at all? If there is no clear and present threat, then why bother with secrecy?
- devs1010 15y agoWe need to take back the concept of the government serving the people, they are our employees, we pay taxes that go towards their salaries, last time I checked, my boss has the ability to read emails I send from a company email address.
- jmvoodoo 15y agoYou're wrong. You can foia request any communication between government employees and anyone if it was done in their official role or on government equipment. There are some exceptions of course, but generally speaking correspondence is anything but confidential (at least in the USA)
- oasisbob 15y agoIt's really hard to generalize about this in the US, each state has their own laws, FOIA isn't applicable to state and local governments: http://www.nfoic.org/state-foi-laws http://www.nfoic.org/state-foi-laws The allowable exemptions -- and penalties for non-compliance -- vary wildly from state to state.
- jasondrowley 15y agoThanks for disabusing me of my misconception. However, I'm going to have to do more homework on this before I'm willing to concede that you're right.