5 ms·
The problem was that it was entirely biased to one side. They were actively looking to sway an election. Some were fairly innocuous small accounts. And they
by starkd 4y ago
The problem was that it was entirely biased to one side. They were actively looking to sway an election. Some were fairly innocuous small accounts. And they couldn't make exceptions for jokes or satire.
- belltaco 4y agoNo? One of the first tweets mentioned tells republicans to vote on Wednesday, when its too late.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- jacquesm 4y ago
- bitsnbytes 4y ago
- sasattack 4y ago
- RetpolineDrama 4y ago
- RosanaAnaDana 4y ago
- briandear 4y ago
- roflyear 4y agoThis isn't true, though? Seems like the coms I have seen are largely either neutral or balanced between benefiting various political parties.
- starkd 4y agoIt was definitely not neutral. But any effort by a government body to censor public forums crosses a dangerous line. It's not the FBI's job to do that, and they lose credibility in the public eye as a neutral arm of law-enforcement.
- roflyear 4y agoDefine "censor" for me, please. I think we have different definitions...
- djur 4y agoTaibbi's thread shows examples of the FBI reporting left-wing accounts for misinformation.