Thanks! I'm still working through Rajpopat's thesis, but at a high level, it doesn't particularly "revolutionize" our understanding of the Astadhyayi. It's just

Thanks! I'm still working through Rajpopat's thesis, but at a high level, it doesn't particularly "revolutionize" our understanding of the Astadhyayi. It's just further proof of Panini's ingenuity and the consistency & completeness of perhaps the only exhaustive symbolic/computational account of a natural language. Makes me even prouder to consider myself part of this millennia-old linguistic tradition.