3 ms·
> "Fuck the poor." You said that, not me. > "yeah poor people are parasites who deserve to be crushed under my boot" You said that, not me. > Be honest and
by rglover 4y ago
> "Fuck the poor."
You said that, not me.
> "yeah poor people are parasites who deserve to be crushed under my boot"
You said that, not me.
> Be honest and start there next time.
Take your own advice—you seem deeply disturbed.
- vel0city 4y ago>> "Fuck the poor." > You said that, not me. The only effective way to "vote" in the Bitcoin world is to mine. The only way to mine is to be wealthy, as I've established here. The only way to be wealthy is to not be poor. Otherwise, you're just sending a letter to the lords to maybe adjust how the system works. Just being a vendor that accepts Bitcoin is the same as just taking USD and hoping the Federal Reserve moves in your interests. You're exerting the same controls overall. In the end, some outside group you have little to no control over has influence in the Monopoly bucks you're trading in. Just in one case, its the miners/exchanges (global markets for BTC). In the other, the Federal Reserve/US Government/the global market for dollars. Otherwise, making a lemonade stand or making a facebook post is the same as the right to vote in the United States. If I'm wrong about how providing services in BTC is different in terms of providing services in USD as an example of exerting democratic forces in the currency feel free to share. I'm definitely down for more examination in the topic, but from what I see so far it doesn't seem like Bitcoin is democratic or disconnected from large capital interests than USD in the end. At least with USD there's some loosely disconnected system from the people I vote for to the people actually appointed to the levers, in BTC its just the people who managed to buy the good mining hardware a few years ago or who manages to find a more efficient way to compute SHA hashes next year.