That may be true, but most jurisdictions recognize an inherent right to physical privacy which isn't lost based on how securely the premises are sealed. So, th

That may be true, but most jurisdictions recognize an inherent right to physical privacy which isn't lost based on how securely the premises are sealed. So, the truly problematic part is the trespassing and/or burglary (illicitly entering a building, regardless of destruction or theft of property, meets the test). The law around extracting information from a physical place is something I don't really know about. But either way, we have a parallel in the unlawful access of shit that isn't yours.