3 ms·
You are right. Imagine the possibilities of this being used to create rich backstories for authors / games though. Perhaps the next iteration will be called Ci
by FredPret 4y ago
You are right. Imagine the possibilities of this being used to create rich backstories for authors / games though.
Perhaps the next iteration will be called CiteGPT and will be able to substantiate the claims it makes.
- jerf 4y agoAbsolutely. I'm not against the tech, I'm trying to spread word of what it really is. And that definitely includes finding ways in which it is useful and awesome. When you want confabulation, ChatGPT is definitely ground-breaking, a noticeable improvement over GPT-3 even. "CiteGPT and will be able to substantiate the claims it makes." It'll have to be a fundamentally different architecture. "Maximum probability extension" just isn't going to do that. I'm not saying that's impossible. Presumably it is possible. Humans do it, very far from perfectly (I'm below average on this front myself, I think), but we do it at least partially, so it's clearly possible somehow. But it'll have to be something other than just a scaled up GPT model.