> There are a thousand perfectly rational reasons Definitely. Now I have a simple question to you -- do you honestly think they counted these crashes as Autop

> There are a thousand perfectly rational reasons Definitely. Now I have a simple question to you -- do you honestly think they counted these crashes as Autopilot's fault in their publicly released statistics? > There is pretty extensive rebuttals so the most notable example used in your PDF, including that the car in question didn't even have have FSD purchased and that even if autopiloted was purchased, standard Autopilot would require lane lines to turn on, which this street did not have. Congratulations. I know firsthand how buggy software can be, so I don't trust this explanation, even if Tesla is honest here, but let's assume you explained 1 out of the 16 reported incidents. Would you mind explaining the remaining 15 incidents that were reported and investigated here? Jul 2021 San Diego CA May 2021 Miami FL Mar 2021 Lansing MI Feb 2021 Montgomery County TX Aug 2020 Charlotte NC Jul 2020 Cochise County AZ Jan 2020 West Bridgewater MA Dec 2019 Cloverdale IN Dec 2019 Norwalk CT Jan 2018 Culver City CA Date City/County State Jan 2022 Desert Center CA Sep 2021 Petaluma CA Aug 2021 Orlando FL Apr 2021 Belmont CA Jan 2021 Mount Pleasant SC Nov 2020 Houston TX What about all the crashes that weren't reported and investigated of Autopilot turning off right before the crash? Oh, it's a made up story, right? Twitter will decide the truth? Oh, wait... > A father had the vehicle his child was in attacked. Would you mind providing us some details about the "attack"? His airplane position is publicly available and is not the position of his car. Finally, we are not talking here about banning the account of the person who posted Mr. Musk's airplane positions, but accounts of journalists. If we want to have a constructive discussion, then it's not helpful to simplify all this into one heavily judgemental sentence.