3 ms·
> Of course a chargeback, the final legal method through which you have issues redressed, is a valid reason to deny you further access to a private company's pl
by ClarityJones 4y ago
> Of course a chargeback, the final legal method through which you have issues redressed, is a valid reason to deny you further access to a private company's platform.
I would completely disagree. It depends on whether the chargeback was justified. If a company illegally charges a user and the user merely declines to pay it, the subsequent blackballing (and damages associated with it) are damages of and resulting from the original crime / tort. It begins to smell like extortion.
- thefurdrake 4y ago> I would completely disagree Would you really, though? What does "complete" disagreement take the form of here, the denial of banning for chargebacks entirely? For every random hypothetical one can provide of a company engaging in poor faith, I can invent a hypothetical of someone charging back against a company despite receiving their product in good faith. I did not say "Is always a valid reason", and it perplexes me when I receive responses that seem to deliberately interpret statements as absolutes when they aren't phrased as such. :(
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]