3 ms·
> it's worse than most of its competitors on durability, performance, cost, etc. When you say competitors, do you mean: 1. paid competitors like DB2/MSSQL 2.
by nordsieck 4y ago
> it's worse than most of its competitors on durability, performance, cost, etc.
When you say competitors, do you mean:
1. paid competitors like DB2/MSSQL
2. free competitors like Postgres/MariaDB
3. both
- pclmulqdq 4y agoI generally mean the free competitors, but also the "NewSQL" DBs, cloud company offerings, and data warehousing companies. The traditional "enterprise" databases like MSSQL and Oracle all look kind of silly (from a technical perspective) in comparison.