4 ms·
> Hilarious attempt at misdirection. You don't know the difference between energy and power, nor between energy production and energy storage. That's not "mis
by Turing_Machine 4y ago
> Hilarious attempt at misdirection.
You don't know the difference between energy and power, nor between energy production and energy storage.
That's not "misdirection" of any kind.
- Schroedingersat 4y agoI was quite clear in the distinction both times. Pretending you can't read doesn't help your point.
- Turing_Machine 4y agoNo, you were not "clear". You said that batteries store "power". They do not. Period. Worse still, you were attempting to confuse "power" (actually energy) storage with "power" (actually energy) production. That's not even apples and oranges -- more like apples and poetry. It's like saying that because a refrigerator can hold 100 kilograms of food, buying a refrigerator is same as actually growing 100 kilograms of food. The two are not comparable in any way. P.S. the ad hominem means that you lose. Sorry. We're done.
- Schroedingersat 4y agoDoubling down on lying about words that are right in front of you doesn't make the lie any truer. Nor does having a tantrum over having the lie called out. Instead it just makes you look like a cry-bully. The constant stream of lies and whining when those lies are called out from nuclear "advocates" would reflect incredibly poorly on the industry if it weren't obvious it was just a tactic to keep fossil fuels relevant for a little longer.