Right and now that we have (or will, soon enough) `:has`, I really don't think it's worth mucking up the potentially very simple and sweet nesting syntax to sup

Right and now that we have (or will, soon enough) `:has`, I really don't think it's worth mucking up the potentially very simple and sweet nesting syntax to support something that's probably usually a bad practice anyways (though obviously I'm speaking from a place of little experience using this)