3 ms·
> would you went to actively or passively do business with someone who just rewrites the terms whenever an unwelcome outcome results? It's actually somewhat ki
by Sebb767 4y ago
> would you went to actively or passively do business with someone who just rewrites the terms whenever an unwelcome outcome results?
It's actually somewhat kind of him to rewrite the terms - no, I'm not being sarcastic. He could simply ban anyone he wanted to without any consistency, it's his company after all. Creating rules at least allows some kind of consistency, for what little it might be worth.
- kibwen 4y agoIf a given rule can be unilaterally rewritten at the instantaneous whim of the person in charge of enforcing the rule, then that rule does not exist to guide others or provide consistency, it merely exists to justify authoritarian caprice.
- midoridensha 4y agoBasically, yes. But I suppose if you have to pick between an authoritarian who just goes with instantaneous whims, or one who puts a token effort into making rules even though he breaks them often, the latter seems better, even though both choices suck.
- pfisch 4y agoHe immediately broke his own doxxing rule after making it. He is banning anyone he wants to without any consistency.