So any time some shareholders are upset it automagically legitimizes the use of cyberstalking the private vehicles of the company’s executives? Sorry, but that

So any time some shareholders are upset it automagically legitimizes the use of cyberstalking the private vehicles of the company’s executives? Sorry, but that is a really weird justification. It seems to me that is just the type of issue that corporate boards are designed to handle without the need for vigilanteism.