2 ms·
"Own" in this context means be responsible for. Peer review does not transfer ownership to peers but it does reduce risk of your code breaking. Other people sho
by _8j50 4y ago
"Own" in this context means be responsible for. Peer review does not transfer ownership to peers but it does reduce risk of your code breaking. Other people should not understand your own code (and intent) more than you, so long as that is correct, while everyone in dev/ops shares responsibility of delivering service, you own and are responsible for the part of that service delivery that you authored simply because you are the person most qualified to resolve any issue that arise from that code breaking. If an SRE is keeping your code running then they own the code's uptime in as much as you have been able to communicate the parameters and configuration of the app, but at the end of the day, when there is a bug in the code you are the best person to fix it, so you own it.
- chrsig 4y ago> "Own" in this context means be responsible for. I understand this, this is what I was trying to direct my distaste at. Unfortunately, it seems to have been misconstrued by responders. > you own and are responsible for the part of that service delivery No, I'm just responsible for that part of the service delivery. I own none of it. I object to it in the same way that I object to hearing "we're a family" from leadership.
- _8j50 4y agoSo long as your bosses are ok with that, who cares. Power to you. I was just stating the obvious typical expectation I guess.