2 ms·
What happened to the rule where if the nested selector doesn’t start with & then an explicit @nest is required? Doesn’t that fix the unlimited look-ahead?
by runarberg 4y ago
What happened to the rule where if the nested selector doesn’t start with & then an explicit @nest is required? Doesn’t that fix the unlimited look-ahead?
- Sesse__ 4y agoThat was option 1, and it was voted out for being unneccessarily verbose.