>Nope, the PR was poorly written (maybe the Department is experimenting with chatGPT ?). ChatGPT probably would have done a much better job with access to the

>Nope, the PR was poorly written (maybe the Department is experimenting with chatGPT ?). ChatGPT probably would have done a much better job with access to the publication. Pretty soon, these lousy science journalists are all going to be out of a job when they can't even get basic facts correct, and the real scientists don't have time to write or review PR articles themselves, so an AI will fill that role instead.