3 ms·
> he could "flip" Twitter, if not for a profit, for less than a settlement would have cost. That doesn't really match with what he's done since buying it thoug
by detaro 4y ago
> he could "flip" Twitter, if not for a profit, for less than a settlement would have cost.
That doesn't really match with what he's done since buying it though IMHO. If that's the goal, why get involved as he did, instead of handing over quickly to someone else to manage it and slim it down with less waves?
- Zigurd 4y agoPundits are still claiming Twitter is running "better than ever." When people always tell you you are wonderful and doing a great job, you might start believing your own line of bull.