4 ms·
Individual humans copying corporate products vs corporations copying the work of individual humans they didn't pay. The confusion is that “copyright infringeme
by blamestross 4y ago
Individual humans copying corporate products vs corporations copying the work of individual humans they didn't pay.
The confusion is that “copyright infringement is not theft” really was about being against corporate abuse of individuals. It's still the same situation here.
- scarface74 4y agoSo it’s okay to infringe on copyright against a group of people getting paid by a corporation. But not individual artists and you should definitely not break open source copyright rules?
- blamestross 4y ago"group of people getting paid by a corporation" they are not involved at all. Corporations are their own person's, remember. It's almost like the real problem is asymmetry and abuse of power.
- scarface74 4y agoWho is being “abused” by you not having access to other people’s content in the way you want?
- blamestross 4y agoI think we miscommunicated somewhere. I was being sarcastic when I said cooperations were people. If we had a model of capitalism dominated by collective employee ownership I think your ethical argument might work. We don't.