> It's wild to me that people are giving you trouble for "can't" when "ponderousnessly" is clearly the more compelling target. (An odd choice even if rendered a

> It's wild to me that people are giving you trouble for "can't" when "ponderousnessly" is clearly the more compelling target. (An odd choice even if rendered as "ponderously". "Clumsily unlikely?" Eh, okay, I guess you can have it.) I completely missed that one (and it's much more deserving than "can't"). I assume the size of the word caused most reader's eyes to flow right through it. You win, regardless; ponderously was the intended word, aiming to convey the implication you've described. That said, I wish the focus was on N-Control as an organization and the seemingly bizarre shadowy world of business they may inhabit, rather than my small missteps.