4 ms·
I'm a little confused here. I'm not trying to convince you of the anti-vaxxer side. You said: > "I don't know why the HN comments are acting as if this is som
by bena 4y ago
I'm a little confused here. I'm not trying to convince you of the anti-vaxxer side.
You said:
> "I don't know why the HN comments are acting as if this is some kind of research supporting the anti vaxxer claims."
To which I posted a link of a guy who is acting as if this is some kind of research supporting the anti-vaxxer claims. The comments were trying to head off the exact thing that happened. Because those users know the pattern. They know why this was posted. It was posted specifically as "vindication" for anti-vaxxers. Those comments to point out that this study does not in any way vindicate anti-vaxxers are needed and the people who made them were right to make those comments.
- mrtksn 4y agoOh I wasn't directing my comments to you. My apologies, I just tried to express my reluctance of looking at anti-vaxxer content. Even if this linked OP is just acting, I still find it very repulsive due to my previous experience. I wasn't referring to that comment anyway.
- bena 4y agoAll good then, I just didn't want you to think I was advocating for the anti-vaxxer position. So if that wasn't your intention, apologies to you as well. And I understand your reluctance. After the nth time, the eyes sort of glaze over as you get slapped with the same bad faith arguments supported by bad logic and supported by abused statistics.