4 ms·
I think what this means is AI assistance during interviews may be enough to fool the interviewer. This may finally put an end to remote leet code interviews. Co
by eloff 4y ago
I think what this means is AI assistance during interviews may be enough to fool the interviewer. This may finally put an end to remote leet code interviews. Companies with deep pockets and local companies will probably stick to the status quo and just move to in person interviews again.
- visarga 4y agoI mean, why not embrace the future? Allow people to use AI in interviews, schools and exams. Everyone will use it at work, why not test AI management skills together with problem solving skills. Maybe the best skills of 2019 are not the best skills to have in 2023.
- asvitkine 4y agoBecause coding interviews are only a proxy for what someone needs to do on the job. Presumably, it will become a worse proxy if assisted by AI but other tasks they'll do on the job aren't. For example, debugging a subtle bug in a large codebase. Maybe one day AI can do that too, but that doesn't seem to be the focus here.
- canadianfella 4y ago
- ElevenLathe 4y agoExactly. Interviewing a post-LLM programmer without the aid of an LLM is like doing a running test for a bike messenger job.
- qualudeheart 4y agoDon’t need deep pockets. You don’t have to fly someone out to interview on site. Just have him pay for it himself.
- eloff 4y agoI wouldn’t do that. You’d lose a lot people. As it is, take home assignments cost me a lot on the risk/reward scale.