4 ms·
1- This was 2008 and the guy's retired by now. 2- Outside of engineering (or at least in the Chemistry/Bio field where I came from), conference submissions are
by passwordoops 4y ago
1- This was 2008 and the guy's retired by now.
2- Outside of engineering (or at least in the Chemistry/Bio field where I came from), conference submissions are abstracts not papers. There may sometimes be special issues where speakers are invited to submit a paper after the fact. But "paper" here means drafting the full manuscript and submitting it to the publisher when you're ready to be published in a future issue. So no steering committee, just an Editor-in-Chief who conducts research in the field. In fact referencing conference abstracts was always frowned upon because they never contained enough information to be properly scrutinized.
Speaking of, this whole "reputable papers only happen with conferences" phenomenon was unheard of to me until I joined an engineering company
- titzer 4y agoI'm confused. You had 5 reviewers for an abstract and one of them produced 7 pages of criticism? I'm aware of many venues in Chem that are abstract submission, but it sounds like you were in a full-paper situation.
- shpongled 4y agoOP never said it was an abstract - they are from chem/bio (like me), where papers are submitted primarily to journals, not conferences. They mentioned abstracts in response to your comment about writing to the "steering committee of the conference"