3 ms·
Absolutely! That's the approach that frunk [0] takes. Frunk (and other reflection libraries like it) are suitable for most use cases, and make better use of Rus
by jswrenn 4y ago
Absolutely! That's the approach that frunk [0] takes. Frunk (and other reflection libraries like it) are suitable for most use cases, and make better use of Rust's affordances.
My crate is suitable for cases where you cannot know (or control) the set of types you might need to reflect on in advance. It's primary use-cases are related to debugging.
[0]: https://docs.rs/frunk https://docs.rs/frunk
- halfmatthalfcat 4y agoIs Frunk Rust's Shapeless (from Scala)?
- jswrenn 4y agoYep!