5 ms·

Myself, I've only conducted dozens not hundreds of FAANG-style coding interviews. I also loathe the format, and it does indeed wear on me. I hate every second.

hsuduebc2 4y ago
Damn. What is your success rate? A lot of times it seems to mee that luck and your ability to withstand stress are one of the main factors. Is it something you can teach yourself?
- angarg12 4y ago
  If by success rate you mean inclined rate, it varies a lot by level. I'd say it's around 30% for interns (which is by far more lenient) and closer to 5% for Senior level. However it's also common to downlevel senior candidates rather than downright reject. From my side of the table I can confirm that of course luck plays a role. Nevermind the variability of the coding problems themselves, but the variability on the interviewers. Even in my company, that has a formal process and pretense of objectivity, interviewers quality and expectations vary greatly. In short, I'd say what people on the hiring side hate to hear, but interviewing is ultimately a numbers game. I wouldn't take rejections too seriously. The best you can do is to improve your chances with proper prep (leetcode, system design) and interview broadly.
  - nsxwolf 4y ago
    The illusion of objectivity is strong. We have an official interviewing process. It has a big survey that turns into "metrics". We have a debrief where we talk about the "metrics" as though it was an "evidence based" process. Then you'll hear someone say "Well, he found a solution for the balanced tree problem, but he just didn't seem all that confident doing it, you know?"
    - neilv 4y ago
      > Then you'll hear someone say "Well, he found a solution for the balanced tree problem, but he just didn't seem all that confident doing it, you know?" This sounds like yet more evidence that it's really just pledging a frat.

hsuduebc2 4y ago

Damn. What is your success rate? A lot of times it seems to mee that luck and your ability to withstand stress are one of the main factors. Is it something you can teach yourself?

angarg12 4y ago
If by success rate you mean inclined rate, it varies a lot by level. I'd say it's around 30% for interns (which is by far more lenient) and closer to 5% for Senior level. However it's also common to downlevel senior candidates rather than downright reject. From my side of the table I can confirm that of course luck plays a role. Nevermind the variability of the coding problems themselves, but the variability on the interviewers. Even in my company, that has a formal process and pretense of objectivity, interviewers quality and expectations vary greatly. In short, I'd say what people on the hiring side hate to hear, but interviewing is ultimately a numbers game. I wouldn't take rejections too seriously. The best you can do is to improve your chances with proper prep (leetcode, system design) and interview broadly.
- nsxwolf 4y ago
  The illusion of objectivity is strong. We have an official interviewing process. It has a big survey that turns into "metrics". We have a debrief where we talk about the "metrics" as though it was an "evidence based" process. Then you'll hear someone say "Well, he found a solution for the balanced tree problem, but he just didn't seem all that confident doing it, you know?"
  - neilv 4y ago
    > Then you'll hear someone say "Well, he found a solution for the balanced tree problem, but he just didn't seem all that confident doing it, you know?" This sounds like yet more evidence that it's really just pledging a frat.