4 ms·
Style is entirely subjective and impossible to define. Van Gogh had a style. Are we going to say that we would want a society where only Van Gogh is allowed to
by oneoff786 4y ago
Style is entirely subjective and impossible to define. Van Gogh had a style. Are we going to say that we would want a society where only Van Gogh is allowed to make Impressionist paintings? Who decides if your painting is similar enough to Van Gogh that it’s illegal? What if your style is simplistic. Are you going to need to compare your art to all published art to make sure a court couldn’t find it “too similar”? What if we make a painting with AI that is a mix of Picasso and Van Gogh? Style?
It’s a stupid concept. It would never work. Even the visualizations we see that are explicitly attempting to copy another artist’s style are often still clearly not exactly the same.
- wruza 4y agoI don’t think style will be a subject here at all. Maybe we’ll settle on that AI user must take an exicit permission before training on someone’s content and humans must not.
- oneoff786 4y agoI’ll use the models trained in China then
- FeepingCreature 4y agoSure, we can do that. My argument is just, and has always been, that this is a novel right that is not covered by existing legislation.