3 ms·

> Nobody sees a problem with this? I don't see a problem with it -- I assume it's largely a PR move. If it'll produce an overall positive reaction from the pub

> Nobody sees a problem with this? I don't see a problem with it -- I assume it's largely a PR move. If it'll produce an overall positive reaction from the public, it's a good move, right? You're not suggesting there's something illegal about canceling their booth, are you? > What if I wanted to do the same thing, but for a political opinion? It depends how unpopular that opinion is. If you choose to exclude someone who's a vocal Nazi, it'd probably be smart move to publicly distance yourself. If it's someone who just disagrees with you on tax policy, it'd probably do you more harm than good to try to exclude them on those grounds.

paulhauggis 15y ago
"It depends how unpopular that opinion is. If you choose to exclude someone who's a vocal Nazi, it'd probably be smart move to publicly distance yourself. If it's someone who just disagrees with you on tax policy, it'd probably do you more harm than good to try to exclude them on those grounds." I don't think you could even get away with it. If there were a large enough group of people that were excluded, you would have enough lawsuits in court to put you out of business. Hooters has had lawsuits due to only hiring "attactive people". There as a guy that sued a bunch of night clubs in New York city due to "free drink ladies night"..and he won.