3 ms·
It's not unreasonable for a family member to want to spend their days working at a charity, using the family funds and time for good. But then it gets spun as n
by DwnVoteHoneyPot 4y ago
It's not unreasonable for a family member to want to spend their days working at a charity, using the family funds and time for good. But then it gets spun as nepotism by haters.
- tdeck 4y agoBecause it is nepotism. They're drawing a salary, not volunteering to "do good". Why were they qualified for that position? It's obviously because they're a family member.
- DwnVoteHoneyPot 4y agoSo you want to ban family businesses? Grandma needs to interview for her job making perogies? The daughter needs to do a coding test to prove that she's qualified run the cashier over other candidates?
- Retric 4y agoIs the company public or organization give charitable stats? If so that puts a different spin on things. If you don’t want any strings, then don’t ask for a handout from the taxpayers.
- eadmund 4y ago> If you don’t want any strings, then don’t ask for a handout from the taxpayers. Of course, being tax-exempt is the opposite of a handout from the taxpayers: it’s exemption by the taxtaker.
- Retric 4y agoEarnings are taxed when you make them. You need to have made money to donate it. QED, you earn, get taxed, get a handout.
- tdeck 4y agoWho's talking about banning anything? Were you under the impression that nepotism is a crime?
- camel_Snake 4y agoif they got that job because they are family it's literally nepotism.
- s1artibartfast 4y agoIT is nepotism, but I think people have the mistaken idea that nepotism is unethical in all situations. It isn't necessarily corrupt or illegal.