3 ms·
It's a shame you had to include the latter part of this comment. The point was he didn't deserve the benefit of the doubt on this because of the preponderance
by d23 4y ago
It's a shame you had to include the latter part of this comment. The point was he didn't deserve the benefit of the doubt on this because of the preponderance of the evidence from his past behavior. That was proven correct.
- cinntaile 4y agoThat's how I felt about your comment too, how peculiar. I am aware of Musks history with lying, it was still possible there was an alternative explanation taking into account his strong stance on this particular point. It's not like we had to wait long before we got it clarified. The outcome was a bit of a letdown, but that's how it goes I guess. This story keeps writing itself. [0] [0] https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2022/12/15/twitter-journalists-suspended-musk/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2022/12/15/twitter-jour...