This is such a weird article. Ostensibly, it's about Bluesky, but it spends most of its length on deriding Mastodon, seemingly with other people's hearsay and

This is such a weird article. Ostensibly, it's about Bluesky, but it spends most of its length on deriding Mastodon, seemingly with other people's hearsay and tweets as the only source of (mis)information on the matter. It doesn't seem to say much about Bluesky itself, other than marketing blurb bullet points and praise to the fame of the people behind it. It doesn't seem to me like the author knows what Bluesky is. I certainly can't figure it out myself. It all reads like a "web3" "whitepaper", except I can't figure out what token it is I'm supposed to hodl. But hey, whatever Bluesky is, it must be better than Mastodon, because a bunch of random people, who have never used Mastodon and have no knowledge of how it works, misread the documentation, freaked themselves out on their own misunderstandings, and tweeted scary words about it. How sad.