4 ms·
I am literally responding directly to what you wrote in the way that you wrote it. My counter claim to your initial point is that candidates will be able to use
by autotune 4y ago
I am literally responding directly to what you wrote in the way that you wrote it. My counter claim to your initial point is that candidates will be able to use said AI in competitive programming interviews to fool the interviewer by the interviewee, thereby making competitive programming pointless as an interview tool. It automates it for the interviewee, not the interviewer.
- jstx1 4y agoI thought that you mean companies automating stuff. But it still doesn't make sense - interviewees have been able to cheat in online assessments forever. Does a better way to cheat in a small subset of all the leetcode interivews really make enough of a difference to make all of those interviews obsolete?
- autotune 4y ago> It's a test, a task that the company wants you to do as a candidate, not a task that they need automated You are contradicting your earlier statements. But yes, a tool that can beat leetcode interviews successfully and reliably is a game changer for candidates who want to make it through these pointless LC interviews as a whole.