4 ms·
You'd still have peer review, but in a very different sense. Instead of a formal process by 3 reviewers, you'd have an informal process by everyone who read the
by ProjectArcturis 4y ago
You'd still have peer review, but in a very different sense. Instead of a formal process by 3 reviewers, you'd have an informal process by everyone who read the paper. People would read your dumb 1+1=3 paper, realize that it was wrong, ignore it, and pay less attention to you in the future.
- nixpulvis 4y agoWhat motivates people to even pick up the paper in the first place in this system?
- p0pcult 4y agoWhat motivates people to "do science"?
- ProjectArcturis 4y agoThe paper is in their field of research?