>The fact that this is attempting to specifically target one account is exactly why it's so badly written. It's trying to walk an impossible line of "Elon wants

>The fact that this is attempting to specifically target one account is exactly why it's so badly written. It's trying to walk an impossible line of "Elon wants no censorship, but he wants this censored". Yup! That's why I even mentioned that it was clearly hastily written in an earlier comment. For what it's worth, I think I share your sentiment, re: Musk/freedom of speech. It's hastily written because it's reactionary and, assuming Musk/Twitter can ever actually get their house in order, I'd anticipate that it will be more clearly written into the terms over time. But in spite of it not being written clearly... >re: your edit; find that statement in the "full policy" link at the end of the thread. It's not documented there. ... I've still managed to demonstrate in this comment chain that I was able to understand the intent of the poorly-written "full policy" link, based on my assertion yesterday followed by the confirmation Tweet that I shared this morning. And I'm fairly certain you did, too. This comment chain is feeling incredibly cyclical, so I'm gonna bounce.