3 ms·
I'm not sure about the pros and cons of peer review but if anyone is claiming that that are doing science, then they must publish raw data so that others can re
by osigurdson 4y ago
I'm not sure about the pros and cons of peer review but if anyone is claiming that that are doing science, then they must publish raw data so that others can review it. This was the first thing that jumped out at me after reading "Accelerate" - so many claims that everything based on "data". I don't necessarily disagree with the conclusions in the book but I think really just a formalization of Google's development practices. The book should have been called "How we do things at Google".
- phyrex 4y agoWell in the book that actually has that content (and very nearly that title: https://abseil.io/resources/swe-book https://abseil.io/resources/swe-book) they explain that they set themselves up to follow the best practices found by the company that eventually published Accelerate, even before google bought them
- osigurdson 4y ago>> they explain that they set themselves up to follow the best practices found by the company that eventually published Accelerate Do you mean as far back as the early days < 2000 or did this happen well after they were established (> 2015). If the latter, how much actually changed?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]