3 ms·
I'd see it in the same framing as artificial sweetners, margarine and other "ersatz" peoducts: they don't need and might not want to have exactly the same prop
by makeitdouble 4y ago
I'd see it in the same framing as artificial sweetners, margarine and other "ersatz" peoducts: they don't need and might not want to have exactly the same properties as what they replace.
In practice less caloric meat, or in general meat that tastes good but has little impact on someone's diet in good or bad ways would be a fantastic product in itself.
- n4r9 4y agoI do see what you're saying but there's a crucial difference between sugar and meat. Sugar gives almost no marginal nutritional gain for a modern human. It can be substituted with something "empty" without thinking about it. If you do the same with meat, you have to get the nutrition from somewhere else. Also, meat is generally a healthy food source. In terms of protein per calorie, chicken breast and steak are up with with pure protein shakes.