3 ms·
I don't get your distinction: copyright infringement is illegal, so "infringing" implies "illegal"
by jefftk 4y ago
I don't get your distinction: copyright infringement is illegal, so "infringing" implies "illegal"
- dredmorbius 4y agoInfringement carries both civil (noncriminal) and criminal proscriptions and liabilities under much law, e.g., under US law, 17 USC Chapter 5: <https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/chapter-5 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/chapter-5>
- Taywee 4y agoFrom that link, criminal copyright infringement depends on specific circumstances that don't directly apply here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/506 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/506
- dredmorbius 4y agoIt's unclear whether "here" refers to the artists spoofing Disney, or other actors pirating / duplicating artists' work for commercial use. In the former case, I'd agree. In the second, there's a clear violation of 17 USC 506(a)(1)(A).
- Taywee 4y agoIt's civil vs criminal law. Illegal usually implies breaking a law and committing a crime. Copyright infringement is a civil matter, not criminal.
- dredmorbius 4y agoFalse. <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33999561 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33999561>