3 ms·
A bulldozer destroys the park and other people's ability to enjoy it -- active, destructive. Passively training a model on an artwork does not change the art i
by residualmind 4y ago
A bulldozer destroys the park and other people's ability to enjoy it -- active, destructive.
Passively training a model on an artwork does not change the art in the slightest -- passive, non-destructive
Mind you, this is not talking about the usage rights of images generated from such a model, that's a completely different story and a legal one.
- 6P58r3MXJSLi 4y ago> A bulldozer destroys the park and other people's ability to enjoy it hear hear... > Passively training a model on an artwork does not change the art in the slightest copyright holders, I mean individual authors, people who actually produced the content being used, disagree. They say AI is like a bulldozer destroying the park to them. Which technically is true, it's a machine that someone (some interested party maybe?) is trying to disguise as a human, doing human stuff. But it's not. > passive, non-destructive Passive, non-destructive, in this context means - passive: people send the images to you, you don't go looking for them - non-destructive: people authorized you, otherwise it's destructive of their rights.