3 ms·
I think this is some advanced level tech-company-politics-jiujitsu. The challenge is getting one or two companies to adopt it, then the CTO's of other companie
by lifeisstillgood 4y ago
I think this is some advanced level tech-company-politics-jiujitsu.
The challenge is getting one or two companies to adopt it, then the CTO's of other companies will have to admit they are on "maturity level 1" when rival X is on level 3.
Its a neat idea.
My quibble is this would be a really good FOSS Maturity Model (ie contributions to OSS projects in general)
- WastingMyTime89 4y agoYes, it's written considering companies with a formal yearly review process centered on cleary defined objectives. My guess is that it's supposed to be used as a guideline to help companies see how they are positionned with regard to kernel development but is somewhat strangely built to my management consultant eyes. It's a multi-axis analysis but they are not clearly stated. Well, I guess I'm not the intended target. If what they want to do is outreach, they would be better with an additional assessment framework based on it but I think they intend to rely on companies goodwill.