>As an individual, he has probably had net positive environmental impact than the next 1m people combined. This is such a terrible mindset. So we're going to

>As an individual, he has probably had net positive environmental impact than the next 1m people combined. This is such a terrible mindset. So we're going to allow the rich to do whatever damage they want to the environment, personally, if they construct widgets that are slightly less harmful than the next best widget? It's this sort of hypocrisy that prevents people from buying in to the environmental movement: celebrities lecturing the rest of us while they don't alter their lifestyle one iota. The proletariat will never accept it.