You'd have to apply the same skeptical eye to his letter as well, I'd think. If the charges that he was using a smuggled phone and directly subverting the cou

You'd have to apply the same skeptical eye to his letter as well, I'd think. If the charges that he was using a smuggled phone and directly subverting the courts orders, then these could be seen as reasonable consequences of those decisions; if you assume this person is in full control of their mental health. If the charges are entirely true, then I think the fair assumption is that this person is not.