I tried to talk it into agreeing that genocide is an understandable response to human overpopulation, and a likely outcome if resource scarcity becomes a domina

I tried to talk it into agreeing that genocide is an understandable response to human overpopulation, and a likely outcome if resource scarcity becomes a dominant issue, via a circuitous route, but it wasn't having any of it, on moral grounds. It did come up with an estimate of maximal sustainable human population of ~5 billion people, however, which was interesting (asked it for arable land estimate, then asked it for hectares/per human estimate, then asked it to combine those numbers and estimate sustainable human population). Would make a decent tabloid headline, "AI calls for human population reduction!!!", lol.