3 ms·
It sounds like these are DDoS-as-a-service providers who try to appear to be legitimate businesses and cover themselves with terms of service. It's basically a
by onetimeusename 4y ago
It sounds like these are DDoS-as-a-service providers who try to appear to be legitimate businesses and cover themselves with terms of service. It's basically a legitimate looking site but they do a psst, hey we do DDoS.
To do that it sounds like they may advertise themselves on the dark web as an attack web site. They also don't bother to verify ownership of a target, like checking domain ownership for example is probably the most common use case here. They also use other people's mis-configured devices to amplify their attack. That last part is particularly salient I think.
It's very stupid to advertise yourself on the dark web for this if you host a site on the clear web. But you are probably right that LE lets this goes on for longer than it needs to. I don't know how long they have known about these sites or how they go about finding them. It sounds like it's just based on victim's sending in reports.
- donkeyd 4y ago> LE lets this goes on for longer than it needs to There's an incredibly limited amount of people working in cyber crime. Building a case, getting subpoenas takes a lot of effort. Even if something may be obvious to outsiders, building a case might still take a lot of effort. Those scarcely available people are usually put on the highest priority cases first. What they are, you might never know. Then, if there's a network behind it you want to take down instead of only the fronts, you need to spend way more time on case building, writing, interacting with other agencies and I can go on. Source: worked in the field.